APARESH KUMAR SINGH
Kavita Devi @ Kavita Dalmia – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner, Giridih – Respondent
Heard counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioners apprehending forceful dispossession from the suit land comprising Plot No. 179 Thana No. 101 Khata No. 80 area 173 decimal situate at Mouza Lakhari P.S. Giridih (T) district Giridih, as described in the plaint at Annexure-3, instituted Title Suit No. 221/2016 before the Sub Judge-I, Giridih with a prayer for declaration of their right, title and interest over the suit land; restraint upon the Respondents from dispossessing the plaintiffs from the suit land during pendency of the suit and changing the nature and character of the suit land and injunction being made final at the time of judgment and decree; cost, if any, which they may be entitled. Though, defendants are State Officers requiring service of notice under section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure before institution of the suit, but due to urgency shown, by way of an application made under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure (Annexures-4&5), plaintiffs sought waiver of the requirement for early hearing of injunction petition itself. Learned Sub Judge-I, Giridih passed the following order on 20.12.2016 :-
“Plaintiff files attendance through lawyer.
Heard Ld. Court
State of Kerala and others versus Sudhir Kumar Sharma and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.