SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Jhk) 53

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.
Ramchandra Yadav & Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through the Director General of Police, Ranchi & Ors. - Respondents
W. P. (Cr.) No. 249 of 2016
Decided On : 17-01-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Tejo Mistry & S. K. Vishwakarma
For the Respondents: Vijayant Verma, J.C. to G.P. II

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the investigation of offenses under the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act should be conducted by a police officer not below the rank of Dy.S.P. in accordance with Rule 7 of the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1955, and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of “State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Chunnilal alias Chunni Singh”.

Headnote:

Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Investigation - Sections 447, 448, 341, 324, 323, 380, 427, 504, 506 & 34 of I.P.C. and Sections 3(i), (iii)/9 of the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Rule 7 of the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1955

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought further investigation in a case involving various offenses under the Indian Penal Code and the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, arguing that the investigation by a Sub-Inspector of Police was against the spirit of the Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the investigation should be carried out by a police officer not below the rank of Dy.S.P. in accordance with Rule 7 of the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1955, and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of “State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Chunnilal alias Chunni Singh”.

Issues: The main issue was whether the investigation into the offenses under the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act should be conducted by a police officer not below the rank of Dy.S.P.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Rule 7 of the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1955, and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of “State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Chunnilal alias Chunni Singh” to conclude that the investigation should be carried out by a police officer not below the rank of Dy.S.P.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondent to appoint a competent police officer in terms of Rule 7 of the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules to investigate the case within a period of 2 weeks.

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. Tejo Mistry, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vijayant Verma, learned J.C. to G.P. II.

2. In this writ application, the petitioners have prayed for a direction against the respondents for further investigation in connection with Birni P. S. Case No. 156 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 448, 341, 324, 323, 380, 427, 504, 506 & 34 of I.P.C. and Sections 3(i), (iii)/9 of the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. A further prayer has been made for handing over the investigation to a competent person not below the rank of Dy.S.P.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has restricted his prayer only with respect to the investigation to be carried out by a person not below the rank of the Dy.S.P. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in terms of the Section 7 of the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, any investigation with respect to an offence committed under the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is to be done by a person not below the rank of Dy.S.P. Learned counsel has further submitted that in view of the provisions of the statute, the investigation which is being carried out by the Sub-Inspector of Police is against the spirit of the Act and the Rules and therefore appropriate direction be issued for handing over an investigation to the person not below the rank of Dy.S.P. In support of his contention, learned counsel has referred to the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of “State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Chunnilal alias Chunni Singh” reported in (2009) 12 SCC 649.

4. Mr. Vijayant Verma, learned J.C. to G.P. II, on the other hand, has submitted that in terms of Section 9(i) of the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, power to investigate into an offence under the Act has been delegated to a police officer of the rank of Inspector and Sub-Inspector. It has been stated that the notification dated 24.11.2012 has subsequently be reiterated by another notification dated 10.06.2016. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in view of the notification of the State Government, the Sub-Inspector of Police is authorised to investigate into an offence under the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

5. As has been stated by the learned counsel for the parties, the investigation into the offence is still in progress. It appears that thereafter a case was instituted being Birni P. S. Case No. 156 of 2015. Investigation was handed over to Sub-Inspector of Police - Ram Bishun Paswan.

6. Rule 7 of the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1955 lays down as follows:

“7. Investigating Officer-(1) An offence committed under the Act shall be investigated by a police officer not below the rank of a Deputy Superintendent of Police. The Investigating Officer shall be appointed by the State Government, Director-General of Police, Superintendent of Police after taking into account his past experience, sense of ability and justice to perceive the implications of the case and investigate it along with right lines within the shortest possible time.”

7. Rule 7 therefore, categorically envisages that any offence committed under the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act shall be investigated by a police officer not below the rank of Dy.S.P. of Police. In terms of Rule 7 of the Rules, the State Government could not have come out with such notification as has been appended with the counter affidavit by directing that any investigation into an offence under the Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act shall be done by the Inspector or Sub-Inspector of Police.

8. The question as to whether the investigation can be carried out by a police officer below the rank of Dy.S.P. had come up for consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Cour





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top