Sudhir Kumar Saha vs State of Jharkhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 1434

PRAMATH PATNAIK
Sudhir Kumar Saha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Madan Mohan Pan
For the Respondents: Mr. Atanu Banerjee

Order :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are retired from the said post of teaching and non-teaching of minority Aided High School, details of the individual are being shown in the chart given below:

Sl No	Name of the petitioner/Teacher	Name of the School	Date of appointment	Date of Retirement
1.	Sudhir Kumar Saha	Annada High School, Hazaribag	01/06/73	31.12.2004
2	Dhirendra Nath Mahato	Annada High School, Hazaribag	15.2.1990	30.4.2015
3	Ajit Kumar Banerjee	Annada High School, Hazaribag	29.4.1980	31.8.2013
4	Mihir Kumar Gupta	Annada High School, Hazaribag	04/12/69	31.8.2001

3. It is the contention of the petitioners that the school in question is Government Aided Minority Schools and all expenses towards payment of salary and retirement benefits of the school employees is funded by the State Government from the public exchequer. The petitioners are also getting pension o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 1434

PRAMATH PATNAIKSudhir Kumar Saha – AppellantVersusState of Jharkhand – Respondent

PRAMATH PATNAIK
Sudhir Kumar Saha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent