PRAMATH PATNAIK
Y. Takumbuba, S/o Yangernok – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Pramath Patnaik, J.
In the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has inter alia prayed for quashing order dated 14.08.2002, by which, the petitioner has been removed from services; for quashing order dated 29.10.2012, by which the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected and for quashing order dated 05.06.2013, by which, the revision application preferred by the petitioner has been rejected.
2. The facts, in brief, is that petitioner, who was a constable in CISF was deputed in HEC, Ranchi since 1999. While continuing as such a memo of charge was served upon the petitioner for remaining absent unauthorizedly without any information and without permission from competent authorities. Basing on such charges, a departmental proceeding was initiated against the petitioner, in which, after ex-parte enquiry, the enquiry officer submitted its report and on the basis of such report, the disciplinary authority imposed the punishment of removal from services upon the petitioner vide order dated 14.08.2002. However, it is averred that since the petitioner was suffering from Schizophrenia, a deadly mental disease, he was under prolonged medical treatment and when he wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.