SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Jhk) 378

PRAMATH PATNAIK
Y. Takumbuba, S/o Yangernok – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ramashray Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajiv Sinha, ASGI

JUDGMENT :

Pramath Patnaik, J.

In the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has inter alia prayed for quashing order dated 14.08.2002, by which, the petitioner has been removed from services; for quashing order dated 29.10.2012, by which the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected and for quashing order dated 05.06.2013, by which, the revision application preferred by the petitioner has been rejected.

2. The facts, in brief, is that petitioner, who was a constable in CISF was deputed in HEC, Ranchi since 1999. While continuing as such a memo of charge was served upon the petitioner for remaining absent unauthorizedly without any information and without permission from competent authorities. Basing on such charges, a departmental proceeding was initiated against the petitioner, in which, after ex-parte enquiry, the enquiry officer submitted its report and on the basis of such report, the disciplinary authority imposed the punishment of removal from services upon the petitioner vide order dated 14.08.2002. However, it is averred that since the petitioner was suffering from Schizophrenia, a deadly mental disease, he was under prolonged medical treatment and when he wa








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top