Hari Sharma, Son of Sri Tejnarayan Sharma vs State of Jharkhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 Supreme(Jhk) 569

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Hari Sharma, Son of Sri Tejnarayan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Sameer Saurabh, Advocate Mr. Sunil Mahto, Advocate Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Tiwary, Advocate, Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.A.G Mr. Rajesh Kumaer, G.P. V. Mr. D. K. Dubey, Sr. S.C.I, Mrs. Amrita Kumari, J.C. to Sr. S.C.

ORDER :

A qualification of Graduation with combination of two subjects for appointment of Graduate Trained Teachers under Advertisement No. 21 of 2016 has become a subject for controversy.

2. Petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are Arts Graduates and Science Graduates. The applicants with History as a subject in Graduation are aggrieved of the required eligibility qualification of Graduation with History and Political Science, and the Science Graduates in Chemistry are aggrieved of the qualification combination of three subjects viz. Botany, Zoology and Chemistry at Graduation level. Their subject combination in Graduation is given in the chart below :

ARTS GRADUATES:

Writ Petition No.	Petitioner No.	Subject
1130 of 2017	1	History (Hons.) Sociology, Labour and Social Welfare
	2	History (Hons.) English, Sociology
	3	Anthropology (Hons.) History, Economics
	4	History (Hons.) Sociology, English
	5	History (Hons.) Psychology, Philosophy
	6	History (Hons.) Sociology, Labour and Social Welfar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 Supreme(Jhk) 569

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHARHari Sharma, Son of Sri Tejnarayan Sharma – AppellantVersusState of Jharkhand – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Hari Sharma, Son of Sri Tejnarayan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent