RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
Vidisa Nupur – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Heard Mr. P.C. Tripathi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Mahesh Tewari, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2.
2. In this application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings in connection with Bariatu P.S. Case No. 368 of 2010 including the order dated 06.05.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi by which cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. It has been submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the allegations which have been made in the First Information Report are general and omnibus in nature. Learned senior counsel submits that the petitioner is the married-sister-in-law of the deceased and only fleeting reference has been made with respect to the demand of dowry made by her which cannot be by any stretch of imagination be believable. Learned senior counsel further submits that initially the case was instituted under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code but subsequently in course of investigation it came to light that the deceased had d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.