APARESH KUMAR SINGH
Pradeep Kumar Roy – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. In all these writ petitions common issues are involved and therefore they have been heard together.
3. By the impugned orders of the same date 27th August, 2016 in respective S.A.R Cases in all these writ petitions, the Respondent-Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Chas, Bokaro has directed restoration of land indicated therein in favour of Khatiyani Raiyat. The text and context of all the impugned orders are also the same.
4. For the convenience sake, facts as have been pleaded in W.P.(C) No. 6084 of 2016 by the rival parties are being noticed hereinafter. At the same time, a Chart containing details of individual writ petitioners; initial date of transfer from Khatiyani Raiyat through registered sale deed; registered sale deed numbers and dates on which petitioners' family purchased the land; Sub Plot numbers; total area transferred (in decimal); area acquired for N.H-23 (in decimal) and area for which restoration in S.A.R Case in individual cases have been sought for are also indicated hereinafter. The lands in question are situated at Village-Marafari, Thana no. 169, Khata no. 23, Plot no. 4807, Circle-Chas, Bokaro.
In all cases, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.