H.C.MISHRA, S.N.PATHAK
Shivesh Kumar Jha – Appellant
Versus
Minu Jha @ Golden – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the sole respondent. Both the parties are also present in Court in person.
2. The plaintiff appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 22nd of August, 2014, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad, in Title Matrimonial Suit No. 228 of 2009, whereby the suit, filed by the appellant husband for dissolution of marriage between the parties, by a decree of divorce, under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, has been dismissed by the learned Court below on contest.
3. The facts of the case lie in a short compass. Both the parties were married, according to the Hindu rites and customs on 11.2.2008. Soon after the marriage, i.e., on 13.2.2008, father of the plaintiff appellant died due to cancer, and as such the holy rituals of Chaturthi, which is performed in the community of the parties, could not be performed, and the Bidai of the respondent to her matrimonial home, also could not be done. According to the plaintiff appellant’s case, after the death of his father, it was agreed in his family that the plaintiff appellant will be getting the appointment on compassionate basis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.