RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
Dilip Kumar Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
I.A. No. 8468 of 2016
This interlocutory application has been preferred by the starling petitioners for exemption from surrender in terms of Rule 159 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules, 2001 in view of the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties.
2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in view of the settlement which has been arrived at between the parties, an amount of Rs.10,000/- has already been deposited in the account of the opposite party no. 2.
3. Considering the fact that the compromise has been effected between the parties and good relations have been restored, this application is allowed. Petitioner is exempted from surrender in terms of Rule 159 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules, 2001.
4. I.A. No. 8468 of 2016 is disposed of.
Cr. M.P. No. 1210 of 2016 :
5. Heard the parties.
6. In this application, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 5.8.2016, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar in Cr. Appeal No. 51 of 2011, by which the appeal preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.7.2011, passed by the learned S.D.J.M, Madhupur at Deoghar in P.C.R. Case No. 65 of 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.