SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Jhk) 1050

S.N.PATHAK
Naresh Prasad Keshri – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Sahani
For the Respondents: Mr. Raunak Sahay

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the Office Order No. 8 dated 11.02.2010 (Annexure-5) issued by the Office of the respondent No. 5, whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been deputed to the post of Accounts Clerk without extending financial benefits of the said post.

2. The petitioner was appointed as typist on daily-wages under the respondent no. 5 in the year 1980. In the year, 1984, the petitioner was appointed as Choukidar in the work charge Establishment. It is stated that as the petitioner was efficient in typing, he performed the work of typist since 1984 in the said Department/office. On 22.12.1991, the Establishment Committee of the said Department recommended the name of the petitioner for appointment as Typist against the vacant post on the basis of his experience of the said post. Thereafter, no steps were taken by the respondents in the matter of promotion of the petitioner from Class-IV post to Class-III post. As no steps were taken, the petitioner filed a writ petition before this Court vide W.P.(S) No. 1116 of 2007 for direction upon the respondents to promote him to Class-III post for which he is eligible. The said










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top