Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.

2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 27th May, 2009, passed by the learned 6th, Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, in S.T. No. 351 of 2004, whereby, the sale appellant has been found guilty and convicted for the offences under Sections 302, 328, 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon hearing on the point of sentence, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for life for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, R.I. for 10 years for the offence under Section 328 of the Indian Penal Code and R.I. for 2 years for the offence u/s 201 of the Indian Penal Code. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

3. The prosecution case was instituted on the basis of written report submitted by the Police Officer-Paras Nath Singh (P.W. 6), which shows that an U.D. Case was instituted on the basis of the fardbeyan of one Saraswati Bauri, the wife of the deceased Budhu Bauri, recorded on 21.5.1995, alleging therein that her husband Budhu Bauri was given a small bottle of english liquor by the accused Haru Bauri and Kalpana Bauri, from whi