APARESH KUMAR SINGH
Chunnilal Chhetry – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Sharan – Respondent
Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.
I.A. No.6078 of 2017 is an application for intervention on behalf of the applicant Kalyani Developers under Order 1, Rule 10 read with Order 22, Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code. The applicant is the purchaser of the suit property through a deed of absolute sale made on 4th July, 2014 Annexure-IA/1 executed by the defendant vendor Smt. Shanti Sharan, of course during pendency of the instant appeal. The appeal is directed against the judgment passed by the learned Court of Sub-Judge-VII, Ranchi in Title Suit No. 283/2002 dated 25th September, 2008 whereby the suit for mandatory decree against the defendant for enforcing the agreement dated 17th April, 2000; directing him to receive the balance consideration, execute and register deed of conveyance in respect of the suit property in favour of the plaintiff and put him in possession thereof, instituted by the plaintiff/appellant herein, has been dismissed on contest.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicants were completely ignorant of the pendency of the instant appeal. The transfer made during pendency of appeal would though be hit by the doctrine of lis pendens under section 52
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.