SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Jhk) 1334

RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
K. R. Malik – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Neeraj Sharma
For the Opposite Party : D.K. Karmakar

ORDER :

Heard Mr. Neeraj Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. D.K. Karmakar, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No. 2.

2. Since common question of facts and laws are involved in all these applications the same are being disposed of by this common order.

Cr. M.P. No. 2366 of 2015 :

3. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the entire criminal Proceeding in connection with C/1 Case No. 2028 of 2015 including the order dated 15.09.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Cr. M.P. No. 772 of 2016 :

4. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings in connection with C/1 Case No. 2026 of 2015 including the order dated 26.11.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur by which cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Cr. M.P. No. 775 of 2016 :

5. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings in co























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top