SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Ashwini Kujur – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
1. The petitioner, who was substituted as defendant no. 1(b) on death of his father- defendant no. 1, is aggrieved of order dated 02.07.2016 passed in Partition Suit No. 39 of 2010 by which the trial court has declined permission to file a separate written statement for taking a stand contrary to the stand of defendant no. 1 in his written statement.
2. Title Partition Suit No. 39 of 2010 was instituted by Dilip Kujur and eight others for a preliminary decree of partition claiming ½ share in schedule 'A' property. Father of the petitioner has been arrayed as defendant no. 1. Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 are real brothers of defendant no. 1 and defendant no. 4 is Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga. The defendant nos. 1 and 2 filed a joint written statement. Defendant no. 3 has filed a separate written statement resisting the prayer for partition of schedule 'A' property. During pendency of the suit the defendant no. 1 died on 05.03.2012 and his legal heirs and three of his sons including the petitioner were substituted in his place vide order dated 17.05.2012. The petitioner-defendant no. 1(b) appeared in the suit on 28.08.2015 and filed written statement with an application dated 08
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.