SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Jhk) 350

RATNAKER BHENGRA
Gurucharan Mukhi S/o Late Raibu Mukhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : M/s. Manoj Tandon, Abhinesh Kumar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Awnish Shankar.

JUDGMENT :

RATNAKER BHENGRA, J.

1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 7.5.2003, passed by learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court) Seraikella in S.T. No. 356 of 1997, whereby and whereunder, the learned court-below convicted the appellant under Sections 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced the appellant to undergo R.I. for seven years under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and three years under Section 27 of the Arms Act. Both sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution case as per fardbeyan (Ext.4) of PW-3, Budheshwar Mukhi is that on 20.05.1995 at about 6.00 p.m. his brother Atang Mukhi, PW-2, was at his house along with other family members. In the meantime, the accused Gurucharan Mukhi, who is his brother-in-law, came there. His brother Atang Mukhi said to the accused why he had come there as he had already quarreled with him in the Company. Then the accused threatened to kill him and then accused started quarreling with his brother Atang. Scuffle took p





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top