SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Jhk) 379

PRAMATH PATNAIK
Virendra Pratap Singh son of late Jaleshwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Steel Authority of India Ltd. , Bokaro – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. G.M. Mishra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Pramath Patnaik, J.

In the instant writ application, the petitioner has inter alia prayed for quashing letter dated 27.03.2004 whereby the request of the petitioner for post V.R.S leasing out of incumbent company quarters on long term has been refused and further for a declaration that the petitioner was in authorized and legal occupation of the company quarters on the date of retirement, therefore he is entitled for permanent allotment of quarters on long term lease in terms with the Scheme ‘for leasing a house to employee-2003’ and further to hold and declare that withholding of amount of Rs. 2,23,788/- from the post V.R.S Benefit is grossly arbitrary and the petitioner is entitled for refund/adjustment of the same as against the long term lease of the quarters in question. Alternatively, prayer has been made for revocation of voluntary retirement of the petitioner and permit him to re-join the services.

2. The facts, as delineated, in the writ application, in brief is that petitioner after serving the respondents-company for a long time, opted and applied for Volunta





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top