SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Jhk) 1300

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Dhrub Narayan Upadhyay, J.
Natwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
M.A. No. 34 of 2013
Decided On : 26-03-2014

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Chaitali Chatterjee Sinha.
For the Respondents: R.N. Ray, Jalisur Rahman.

The Tribunal does not have the authority to reduce the compensation amount if the death occurred in the accident, as per the provisions of the Railway Accident and Untoward Incident (Compensation) Rules, 1990.

Headnote:

Compensation - Railway Accident - Interpretation of Railway Accident and Untoward Incident (Compensation) Rules, 1990

Fact of the Case:

Shanti Devi, with a valid ticket, fell and died in a train accident near Rajendra Nagar Railway Station. The Railway Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 2 lacs as compensation instead of Rs. 4 lacs, citing negligence on the part of the deceased.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Tribunal had no authority to reduce the compensation amount if the death occurred in the accident, as per the provisions of the Railway Accident and Untoward Incident (Compensation) Rules, 1990. The judgment was modified to award the claimant Rs. 2 lacs more with interest.

Issues: Interpretation of compensation rules for railway accidents, authority of the Tribunal to reduce compensation amount, and calculation of interest on the awarded sum.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Tribunal lacked the authority to reduce the compensation amount if the death occurred in the accident, as per the provisions of the Railway Accident and Untoward Incident (Compensation) Rules, 1990.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the judgment was modified to award the claimant Rs. 2 lacs more with interest at 9% from the date of filing of the claim application.

JUDGMENT :

Dhrub Narayan Upadhyay, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 13th August, 2012, passed by learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Ranchi Bench in Case Nos. OA (IIU) RNC/2007/0060 (Old No. OU-70060/07) whereby the claimant who happens to be husband of the deceased has been allowed Rs. 2 lacs as compensation in lieu of the death of Shanti Devi. The brief facts are that Shanti Devi, having second class ticket, boarded in Hatia Patna Patliputra Express at Ranchi on 12th February, 2007. On the next morning while the train was approaching Rajendra Nagar Station, due to jerk and jolt Shanti Devi fell down and died at the spot.

2. It is submitted that the Tribunal has accepted that Shanti Devi was travelling in the train with a valid ticket and she met with an accident near Rajendra Nagar Railway Station. The learned Tribunal, instead of allowing Rs. 4 lacs as compensation, has allowed only Rs. 2 lacs and the reason assigned is not tenable in the eye of law. The Tribunal has no right to reduce the compensation amount if the death of deceased occurred in the accident. The finding of the Tribunal is incorrect that the deceased himself was negligent and due to her fault she fell down. The learned Counsel has further pointed out that interest from the date of filing has not been given by the learned Tribunal.

3. The Counsel appearing for the respondent has opposed the argument.

4. I have gone through the impugned judgment and relevant provisions of law. It is very clear in Part I of Schedule under Rule 3 of the Railway Accident and Untoward Incident (Compensation) Rules, 1990 that in case of death a sum of Rs. 4 lacs is to be paid to the claimant. The Tribunal has not been given authority to reduce the amount, if it is held that the death has occurred and covered under the provision of Clause (c) of Section 123 of the Railway Act, 1989.

5. In the circumstances, the impugned judgment and award is modified to the extent that the claimant shall be paid Rs. 2 lacs more with interest @ 9% from the date of filing of the claim application which will be calculated on the total sum of Rs. 4 lacs. Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top