D.N. PATEL, J.

1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner whose money-suit type of writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 3657 of 2015 was dismissed by the learned Single vide order dated 8th October, 2015.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that several work orders were given for different amount and for different construction type of work and money suit type of writ petition was preferred by this appellant (original petitioner) for getting aforesaid amount, for which, respondents have raised dispute about the nature of the work and completion of the work.

Reasons:

3. Having heard learned counsels for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that money suit type of writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 3657 of 2015 was preferred by this appellant (original petitioner) for getting amount of Rs.2,43,630/- for several work orders, which are as under:

Sl. No.	Date of work order	Amount of the construction
1	07.03.2009	Rs.40,920/-
2	09.03.2009