DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL, J.

1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioners, being aggrieved and feeling dissatisfied, by the judgment and order delivered by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 2728 of 2016 dated 28th July, 2016, whereby, the prayer for regularisation in the services as Non-Formal Education Instructors has been rejected and hence, the original petitioners have preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.

2. Having heard counsels for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that these appellants are heavily relying upon the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Patna High Court in writ petition being C.W.J.C. No. 8418 of 2010 which was confirmed in L.P.A. No. 1489 of 2011. It is submitted by the counsel for the appellants that these appellants are out of job from year, 2001 onwards and they have put several years of services and hence, they should be regularised in the services of Non-Formal Education Instructors. These aspects of the matter have not been properly appreciated by the learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition preferred by these appellants and hence, the said judg