RAJESH SHANKAR
Mahabir Prasad Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
1. Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, Advocate, submits that though he was earlier appearing on behalf of the petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 7739 of 2006, however, the brief has been taken back by the petitioners and, therefore, he is not in a position to represent the said petitioners. Thus, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 7739 of 2006.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. Both these writ petitions have been filed for quashing the revisional order dated 14.10.2006 passed in Mutation Revision No. 20 of 2002-03, whereby the respondent no. 3 allowed the revision application of the respondent nos. 6 to 8.
4. For better appreciation of the issue involved, W.P. (C) No. 7106 of 2006 has been taken as a lead case and the petitioners of W.P. (C) No. 7739 of 2006, who are also the proforma respondents in W.P. (C) No. 7106 of 2006 are referred as proforma respondent hereinafter.
5. The factual background of the case is that the respondent nos. 6 to 8 had filed an application for mutation of the land situated at Mouza-Telaiya, Thana No. 244 within Ward No. 4 of Jhumri Telaiya Municipality, District-Koderma under Khata No. 216 (old), 281 (new), Plot No. 3336/3512 (old),
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.