SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Jhk) 1585

ANANT BIJAY SINGH
Bhuneshwar Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : L.C. Roy
For the Respondent: Niranjan Kumar

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. All the four appellants have preferred the instant appeal under Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 17.05.2017 passed in A.B.P. No.436 of 2017 in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No.364 of 2016, by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-Ist cum Special Judge, Deoghar, lodged under Sections 147, 148, 341, 447, 323, 467, 468, 420, 354(B), 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Under Sections 3(X) of the S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and cognizance has been taken under Sections 3(II)(x) of the S.C. & S.T. Prevention of Atrocity Act whereby learned Special Judge has rejected prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

3. The aforesaid case being S.C./S.T. No.169 of 2016 has been lodged before the court learned Special Judge, Deoghar, alleging therein that she has been in possession of the land detail has been mentioned in Para-2 of the complaint petition and the accused persons/ appellants herein after creating forge and fabricated documents tried to dispossess the informant from the land, in question for which litigations are going on in between the parties.

4.





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top