I.A. No. 5338 of 2017

This interlocutory application has been preferred by the petitioners for deleting the name of O.P. No. 2 and inserting the name of the informant i.e. Daisy Hansda.

2. It appears that due to inadvertence, husband of the informant has been made as O.P. No. 2. In such view of the matter, in the cause title of the main application, name of O.P. No. 2 be deleted and the name of the informant-Daisy Hansda be inserted.

3. I.A. No. 5338 of 2017 is disposed of.

I.A. No. 8948 of 2017

4. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the petitioners for amending the prayer portion made in the main application in view of subsequent development, by virtue of which, process under section 83 Cr.P.C. has been ordered to be issued by order dated 23.5.2017.

5. Although prayer made in the main application is for quashing the entire criminal proceeding but since order has been passed directing taking coercive steps against the petitioners, in order to avoid multiplicity of proceeding, this application is allowed. Let I.A. No. 8948 of 2017 be treated as a part of the main application.

Cr. M.P. No. 1171 of 2017

6. Heard the parties.

7. In this application, the petitioners have