Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. Nobody appears on behalf of the respondent no.1.

3. So far as respondent no. 2 is concerned, he has entered appearance through Advocate by filing Vakalatnama but nobody is appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2. It further appears from the record that no counter-affidavit has also been filed by the respondents.

4. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs :

“(a) For quashing the purported order dated 26.02.2002 (Annexure-14) whereby and whereunder the respondent No. 1 has arbitrarily, illegally and in wrong exercise of jurisdiction exonerated the respondent No. 2 from his liability for repayment of the loan of the petitioner-bank by ignoring or disregarding the admitted factum that the said respondent No. 2 was a guarantor in his individual capacity apart from being a director of the borrower company by the name of M/s Red ball Express Carriers Private Limited.

(b) For issuance of an appropriate writ or order or direction for the Certificate Officer, Hazaribagh to proceed against all the certificate debtors in pursuance of the Certificate Case No. 37/86-87 for realization of the petitioner