SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Jhk) 927

RAJESH SHANKAR
Bhanu Priya – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Kaustav Roy, A.C to Sr. S.C-III
For the JAC :Ms. Richa Sanchita, Advocate.

ORDER :

1. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to declare the petitioner as a successful candidate in the JTET (PT), 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said examination’), conducted by the Jharkhand Academic Council (in short JAC), as she has got 78 marks, which is higher than that of the last successful candidate.

2. The factual background of the case, as stated in the writ petition, is that the JAC published Advertisement No. 47/2016 dated 31.08.2016 for conducting the said examination and thereby inviting applications from the candidates who were interested and eligible for the same. Pursuant to the said advertisement, the petitioner applied and appeared in the said examination held on 20.11.2016. The respondent-JAC declared the result of the said examination, however, the name of the petitioner did not find place in the list of the successful candidates. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 before the respondent-JAC for showing her OMR sheet. Vide letter dated 17.06.2017


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top