SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Jhk) 1088

APARESH KUMAR SINGH, RATNAKER BHENGRA
Samu Tirkey – Appellant
Versus
Chandrakala Tirkey – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mrs. Saroj Kumari.
For the Respondents: Mrs. Mahua Palit, Mr. A.K. Lall.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Appellant is aggrieved by the dismissal of Original Suit (M.T.S. No. 21 of 2007) by the judgment dated 4.1.2016 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi, whereunder the Suit for declaration of his marriage with respondent No. 1 as valid and further to declare his alleged relationship with respondent No. 2 as void ab initio, has been dismissed.

3. Plaintiff/appellant pleaded before the learned family court that petitioner and both the respondents are members of the Scheduled Tribe community and they are governed by Oraon Customary Law. They are also governed by Hindu customary Law for the purposes of marriage and other social meets. Marriage with respondent no. 1 was solemnized on 8.2.1992 as per Hindu rites and customs, out of which, five children named therein have been born. The name of respondent no. 1 is entered, as nominee, in his service record under the Life Insurance Corporation. His marriage with respondent no. 1 was registered on 24.5.2006 vide Certificate No. 44 of 2006. He alleges that suddenl



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top