Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel Ms. Asmita Shrivastava submits that the respondent has taken no objection from her office two years back. No one else has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. On the earlier date also no body appeared on behalf of the respondent and the matter was adjourned. Before the learned Mediator, JHALSA also, parties did not appear and mediation could not take off.

2. The present appellant is the husband, aggrieved by the dismissal of Matrimonial Suit No. 19 of 2008 by the judgment dated 16.1.2015, decree dated 29.1.2015 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chatra, whereunder his prayer for dissolution of marriage on grounds of adultery and cruelty, in terms of section 13(1)(i) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, has been rejected.

3. Appellant, inter alia, pleaded before the learned Family Court as under:

Parties solemnized their marriage on 23.6.2004 as per Hindu rites and customs at Rajrappa Temple. They spent peaceful conjugal life for some time in the matrimonial house but after six months, one Sunil Kumar Mehta, who was impleaded as Opposite No. 2, started visiting his house. Thereafter, respondent star