SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Jhk) 499

RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
Vivekanand Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Arbind Kumar, A.C. to G.P.II

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arbind Kumar, learned A.C. to G.P.II for the respondents.

2. The petitioner in this application has prayed for setting aside the order dated 27/28.12.2018 passed by the District Certificate Officer, Koderma in Certificate Case No. 317/16-17, whereby and whereunder the review application preferred by the petitioner on 26.12.2018 has been rejected. The petitioner has also prayed for setting aside the order dated 06.11.2018 passed by the District Certificate Officer, Koderma in Certificate Case No. 317/16-17 and for a direction for grant of opportunity to file objection under Section 9 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914 after providing all the papers for consideration. The petitioner has further prayed for quashing of the subsequent order by which coercive step has been directed to be taken against the petitioner.

3. It appears from the factual aspects of the case that a certificate proceeding was initiated under the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914 against the petitioner as well as other Engineers. An order was passed on 06.11.2018 directing the petitioner to deposit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top