SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Jhk) 515

AMITAV K.GUPTA
Amit Kumar Sahu @ Guddu Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Vikash Pandey, Adv.
For the State : A.P.P., Mr. Anupam Anand, Adv.

ORDER :

1. I.A. No.2625 of 2019 has been filed stating therein that on the intervention of friends and well wishers, the petitioner and the O.P. No.02 have compromised and amicably settled the dispute.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the SC/ ST Case No.10 of 2017 arising out of Complaint Case No.1076 of 2015 was instituted by O.P. No.02 for the offence under Sections 323, 341 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (For short 'the Act'). It is submitted that the complaint was lodged with respect to the occurrence dated 07.05.2015 and the complainant in para–1 & 4 of the complaint petition has categorically stated that he was working as the driver of witness No.03 namely, Nand Kishore Sahu, who is an agnate of the present petitioner. That for the same occurrence, Nand Kishore Sahu had lodged Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.81 of 2015 on 09.05.2015 as would be evident from Annexure – 2. That the petitioners had faced the trial in the said case and were acquitted by order dated 16.07.2018, passed in G.R No.2743 of 2015 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi.

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top