SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Jhk) 1055

RAKESH RANJAN PRASAD
Ajay Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Manoj Tandon.
For the Respondent: R.P Gupta.

JUDGMENT :

R.R. Prasad, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. The aforesaid interlocutory application bearing No. 2514 of 2006 has been filed wherein prayer has been made to substitute Somri Oraon in place of deceased respondent No. 5, Sukra Oraon, who died during the pendency of hearing of the writ application as she being daughter-in-law of the deceased Sukra Oraon inherited the property of the deceased whereas the interlocutory application bearing No. 2703 of 2006 has been filed on behalf of Pyara Kachhap praying therein to substitute him in place of deceased respondent No. 5, Sukra Oraon, who died without leaving any lineal male descendents Gharjamai adopted into the house as a prospective son-in-law as the petitioner being nearest male agnate has inherited the property of the deceased as per the customs of Oraon.

2. Before adverting to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the facts giving rise to this writ application need to be stated hereunder.

3. As per the case of the petitioner the then Ex-landlords Mahalia Pahan and Gosala Pahan settled the land in the year 1937 to one Chhedi Khansama through Hukumnama with Chaparbandi right, who came in posses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top