SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Jhk) 778

ANANT BIJAY SINGH
Sanjay Nishad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through CBI – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate.
For the CBI :Mr. Rajiv Sinha, Mrs. Nitu Sinha, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. Petitioner has preferred the instant criminal revision invoking revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 & 401 of the Cr.P.C. impugning the order dated 16.01.2019 passed in R.C. No. 1(A)/2018-D (M.C.A. No. 1035 of 2018) registered under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act by learned Special Judge, CBI-cum-Additional Sessions Judge-XI, Dhanbad, whereby and whereunder the petition filed under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. for discharge of the petitioner has been rejected and the learned Special Judge has opined that ample material available on record for framing of charges against the petitioner under Section 7/13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

2. The fact give rise to instant criminal revision is that a written complaint dated 28.01.2018 was submitted to Superintendent of Police, CBI, Dhanbad by Subhash Bauri against Sanjay Nishad (petitioner), who is Clerk in the Office of Project Officer, Dobari Colliery, BCCL, Dhanbad alleging that he has demanded an illegal gratification of Rs. 5,000/-for furnishing details of contribution of Provident Fund (PF) etc, in the name of his father Rupa Bauri, the then Support Mazdoor of Dobari Colliery under Bas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top