IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. through its Chief General Manager (Incharge) - Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India through its Presiding Officer and Ors - Respondent
W.P.(L) No. 4486, 4387 of 2004
Decided On : 21-02-2019
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 32 - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 33-C - Legal contributions to workmen - Transfer conditions - Petitioner is aggrieved by order passed in Application Presiding Officer Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labor Court at Sasol whereby and where application Industrial Disputes Act filed by respondent has been allowed and petitioner has been directed by respondent - Make payment respondent subject to deduction towards legal contributions – Held, However such assertion has not been punctuated by any documentary evidence and it appears that same was vague attempt made by management to deprive workmen concerned from making payment wages for idle period - Sequence of events which has started from transfer of concerned workmen from as Project Area vide office order does indicate that concerned workmen had gone to join in their subsequent place of posting but were not allowed and ultimately at intervention of Director Personnel their joining was permitted mines - Petitioner has claimed that delay had accrued on account of failure in part concerned workmen to join at Project area but it appears that concerned workmen had represented authorities that they should be allowed to resume duty at Project at which condition was put forward regarding vacation of quarter at which response was given that if quarter is allotted – Mines existing quarter shall be vacated - Such plea taken by concerned workmen was reasonable and understandable which should have been compassionately considered b management – Order accordingly
ORDER :
1. The factual as well as the legal aspects are same and similar and as such both the writ applications are being considered and disposed of by this common order.
2. Heard Mr. Rajesh Lala, learned counsel for the petitioner in both the writ applications and Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 in W.P.(L) No. 4486 of 2004. No one appears on behalf of respondent No. 2 in W.P.(L) No. 4387 of 2004 in spite of valid service of notice.
3. In W.P.(L) No. 4486 of 2004, the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 09.08.2002 passed in LC Application No. 5 of 1999 by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court at Asansol, whereby and whereunder, the application u/s 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 filed by the respondent No. 2 has been allowed and the petitioner has been directed by the respondent No. 1 to 2. make payment of Rs. 48,000/-to the respondent No. 2, subject to deduction towards legal contributions.
4. In W.P.(L) No. 4387 of 2004, the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 09.08.2002 passed in LC Application No. 6 of 1999 by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court at Asansol in which the application u/s 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 filed by the respondent No. 2 has been allowed and the petitioner has been directed by the respondent No. 1 to make payment of Rs. 60,000/-to the respondent No. 2, subject to deduction towards legal contributions.
5. The case of the workmen (respondent No. 2 in both the writ applications) is to the effect that they were employed as Pit Clerk and Foreman (E&M) respectively at Rajmahal Group of Mines who by an office order dated 25/27.05.1998 were transferred to Kalidas Project under Satgram Area. Both had reported for duty at Satgram Area but they were not permitted and subsequently a modified order of transfer was issued vide office order No. ECLCMD/C-6B/AG/1513 dated 05.12.1998 in which they were posted at S.P. Mines. It is the case of the workmen that they had reported for duty at S.P. Mines but there also they were not allowed and ultimately both had approached the G.M. (Personnel), ECL at Sanctoria, consequent to which on 28.01.1999 a revised order was issued keeping the earlier orders of transfer in abeyance till further order and ultimately, the Chief General Manager of Rajmahal Area had requested to allow them to join for duty and ultimately both the workmen had reported for duty at Rajmahal Group of Mines on 01.02.1999. The workmen claim that they had to remain idle from June, 1998 to January, 1999 without there being any fault and no wages were paid to them for the said period. The respondent No. 2 in W.P.(L) No. 4486 of 2004 had claimed wages of Rs. 48,000/-, whereas the respondent No. 2 in W.P.(L) No. 4387 of 2004 has claimed wages to the tune of Rs. 60,000/-. Such claims were made by the workmen concerned by filing separate applications u/s 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
6. The management on being noticed had submitted its written statement in which it was stated that the workmen were transferred on administrative grounds initially to Kalidaspur Project under Satgram Area and after their release when their joining were not accepted under Satgram Area, their cases were referred to the Headquarter which issued a fresh order for their posting at S.P. Mines but there also the workmen concerned were not allowed to join and ultimately the G.M. (P&IR), Sanctoria issued an order for their reposting at Rajmahal Area and as the transfer was made on administrative ground which was serious in nature their joining was not accepted at Rajmahal Area also. It is the case of the management that the matter was taken up at the level of Director (Personnel) and considering the situation prevailing both the workmen were allowed to join at S.P. Mines. The management further asserts that the claim for idle wages made by the workmen concerned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.