IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.
Jai Shankar Vishwakarma and Others – Petitioners
Versus
State of Jharkhand and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) Nos. 7084, 7102 of 2011
Decided On : 23-02-2018
Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 - Sections 16 and 16(3) - Registered sale deed - Device to defeat any right of the respondent - Submitted by counsel for petitioners undivided family - Two properties were purchased by petitioners bearing registered sale deed No. both on account with which the respondent no. 5 had filed a pre-emption application is subject matter in these two writ petitions and accordingly both writ petitions have been tagged and are to be heard together. WP (C) No. relates to sale deed no and WP (C) No. relates to sale deed – Held, Sale deeds executed by two persons. Accordingly the application for pre-emption filed by respondent no. 5 in connection with sale deed no has been wrongly allowed by the original authority and aspect of matter has not been considered by authorities below. Even otherwise as per the judgment relied upon by petitioners reported PLJR the right of pre-emption has to be seen on the date of filing of application and on the date of application - Petitioners were adjoining raiyats by virtue of sale deed no. and sale deed No. although they were simultaneously purchased from two different persons - Two writ petitions are allowed
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr. Ayush Aditya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of private respondent no. 5 and Mr. Radha Krishna Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-state.
2. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are members of hindu undivided family. Two properties were purchased by the petitioners bearing registered sale deed No. 589 of 2005 and 590 of 2005 both dated 31.03.2005 on account with which the respondent no. 5 had filed a pre-emption application which is the subject matter in these two writ petitions and accordingly both the writ petitions have been tagged and are to be heard together. WP (C) No. 7102 of 2011 relates to sale deed no 589 dated 31.03.2005 and WP (C) No. 7084 of 2011 relates to sale deed No. 590 of 2005.
3. These two writ petitions have been filed by filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 22.10.2011 passed by the respondent no. 2 in Land Ceiling Revision Case Nos. 34/2009 and 33 of 2009.
The petitioners have further challenged the two appellate orders both dated 19.09.2009 passed by the Respondent no 3 in Land Ceiling Appeal Nos. 05/2007-08 and 12/2007-08.
The petitioners have also challenged the orders dated 12.01.2007 passed by the respondent no. 4 in Land Ceiling Case No. 1/2005-06 and 2/2005-06. The Land Ceiling Cases was instituted on the basis of application for pre-emption filed by the respondent no. 5 in relation to sale deed No. 589 of 2005 and sale deed no 590 of 2005 both dated 31.03.2005.
4. The brief facts as submitted by the counsel for the petitioners in relation to sale deed No. 589 of 2005 are as under:-
North : Nij.
South : Shiv Sao and Murat Sao
East : Mahesh Singh
West : Tulsi Sao
The sale-deed bearing no. 494 dated 18.04.2001 is at Annexure-1 to the writ petition bearing no. W.P.(C) No. 7102 of 2011.
(b) In the year 2005, one of the boundary raiyats towards southern side of the property as contained in Sale-Deed No. 494 dated 18.04.2001 sold out 31 decimals of land in Khata No. 30 (New Khata No. 109), Plot No. 151(New Plot No. 315) to the petitioners by registered sale-deed no. 589 dated 31.03.2005 with the following boundary:
North : Dwarika Vishwakarma
South : Shiva Sao
East : Basudeo Mishra & Raj Ballabh Singh
West : Sitaram Master
(c) The sale-deed dated 31.03.2005 bearing 589 clearly shows Dwarika Vishwarkarma to its North, which is on account of sale-deed no. 494 dated 18.04.2001, therefore, there was no dispute that the father of the petitioner namely, Dwarika Vishwarkarma who was the member of the joint family , was the adjoining raiyat of the property as contained in sale-deed no. 589 dated 31.03.2005 and accordingly the petitioners also have the status of the adjoining raiyat of the property covered under sale deed no 589 dated 31.03.2005 and accordingly the petitioners have rightly purchased the property and there has been no violation of section 16 of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘aforesaid Act’).
(d) The condition precedent for filing application under Section 16(3) of the aforesaid Act is that the transfer of land is made to any person other than the co-sharer of the vended property or to a person other than the adjoining raiyat of the vended property. Only if the said condition is satisfied the raiyat of the adjoining land or co-sharer of vended land will be entitled to the exercise the right of pre-emption. He submits that from the sale-deed no. 589 dated 31.03.2005, showed the name of the father of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.