The court's discussion emphasizes that de-reservation of "Gochar" land should only occur in exceptional circumstances and for valid reasons, with a clear requirement that alternative land must be made available to maintain the minimum percentage of "Gochar" land in the village. Specifically, the court notes that when "Gochar" land is dereserved for public purposes, the authorities are expected to provide an alternative "Gochar" land that is in close proximity to the original land, ensuring it remains within the same village or nearby area.

In the present case, the court observed that the alternative "Gochar" land provided was situated in a different village, approximately 20-30 kilometers away from the original site. The court considered this distance to be significant and not in line with the legal requirement that the alternative land should be within a reasonable proximity to the original "Gochar" land. Therefore, the court indicated that such a distance is not acceptable for the purpose of providing a valid alternative "Gochar" land (!) (!) .

Hence, the court has discussed that alternate "Gochar" land cannot be allotted at a distance of 20-30 kilometers from the original "Gochar" land, as this would violate the principles of maintaining the integrity and purpose of "Gochar" land reservations.