JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Bhaiya Vishwajeet Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, Mr. Subhash Chandra Prakash, learned counsel for the respondent-State, Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Railway.

2. Since in all these first appeals common judgment is under challenge that is why all these first appeals are heard together.

3. The appellants have abandoned the claim of the houses, well and boundary-wall in L.R. Case No. 41/2012, L.R. Case No. 43/2012, L.R. Case No. 44/2012 and L.R. Case No. 45 of 2012.

4. All these first appeals have been filed under section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against the judgment dated 26.06.2013 and award dated 08.07.2013 passed in Land Reference Case No. 37/2012, Land Reference Case No. 41/2012, Land Reference Case No. 45/2012, Land Reference Case No. 43/2012, Land Reference Case No. 40/2012, Land Reference Case No. 32/2012, Land Reference Case No. 34/2012, Land Reference Case No. 44/2012, Land Reference Case No. 38/2012, Land Reference Case No. 36/2012, Land Reference Case No. 35/2012, Land Reference Case No. 33/2012 and L.A. Case No. 01/05-06.

5. From perusal of impugned judgment, it appears that appellants in L.R. Case No. 31 of 2012 and L.R. Case No. 39 of 2012 have not filed first appeal before this Court.

6. Mr. Bhaiya Vishwajeet Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that land in Khata No. 25 Plot No. 616 area 9 decimals, Plot No. 617 area 1 decimal, Plot No. 618 area 7 decimal, Plot No. 619, area 12 decimals total area 29 decimals, Khata No. 19 Plot No. 612 area 124 decimals, Plot No. 613 area 12 decimals, Plot No. 1162 area 0.015 decimal, Plot No. 1163 area 0.51 decimal, Khata No. 27 Plot No. 1161 area 15 decimal total area 1.035 acre in Mouza Pochra, Plot No. 1157/1 area .02 acre, Plot No. 1157 area .03 acre total area .05 acre, Khata No. 1 Plot No. 1157/5 area .02 acre, Khata No. 1 Plot No. 1157 area .025 acre, Khata No. 19 Plot No. 1162 area 0.015 acre total area 0.040 acres, Khata No. 19 Plot No. 1163, Khata No. 43 Plot No. 1158 area .38 acres, Khata No. 43 Plot No. 1158, Khata No. 42 Plot No. 1159/1 area .09 acre, Plot No. 1160 area .14 acre, Plot No. 1168 area .19 acre total area .42 acre, Mouza Pochra Khata No. 86 Plot No. 1164 area .08 acre, Khata No. 40 Plot No. 1173 Mouza Pochra area .03 acre, Khata No. 21, Plot No. 1159 area 0.19 acre, Khata No. 1 Plot No. 1157/1, Khata No. 19 Plot No. 1163/2 were the subject matter in L.R. Case No. 31/2012, L.R. Case No. 32/2012, L.R. Case No. 33/2012, L.R. Case No. 34/2012 L.R. Case No. 35/2012, L.R. Case No. 36/2012, L.R. Case No.37/2012, L.R. Case No. 38/2012, L.R. Case No. 39/2012, L.R. Case No. 40/2012 , L.R. Case No.41/2012, L.R. Case No. 43/2012, L.R. Case No. 44/2012 and L.R. Case No. 45/2012. All these reference cases were arise out of after the award passed by the Collector under section 11 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act and that is why, these reference cases were filed under section 18 of Land Acquisition Act before the court below for enhancement of awarded amount.

7. Mr. Bhaiya Vishwajeet Kumar, learned counsel appearing for appellants submits that land looser objected the amount of compensation they were awarded and the collector made reference in terms of section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to determine the market price of acquired land pursuant to that the above reference cases were registered.

8. Learned counsel for the appellants further submits that valuation of their land required to be considered at least @ Rs. 20,000/- per decimal in view of circle rate fixed by the District Sub-Registrar i.e. Exhibit-4 which were exhibited before the court below whereas the court below has fixed @ Rs. 8,000/- per decimals.

9. Learned counsel for the appellants further submits that land is just next to the National Highway and meant for Ramgarh-Patratu Road. He further submits that lands are very near to Barkakana Railway station and very near within the vicinity of Ram