SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Jhk) 129

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.N. Pathak, J.
Mrs. Prabha Mehrotra – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Human Resources & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(S).No. 121, 123, 128, 129, 133, 305 of 2019
Decided On : 14-02-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate, Mr. Parth Jalan, Advocate, Mr. Surdarshan Shrivastava, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Rajiv Sinha, ASGI, Mr. Bharat Bhushan Prasad, C.G.C., Ms. Bakshi Vibha, Sr. P.C., Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, Advocate

Headnote:

National Institute of Technology Act, 2007 - Rule 29 - Claim for pensionary benefits - Petitioners are either retired employees or legal heirs of retired employees of NIT, Jamshedpur, who have retired prior to 01.04.1992 - Employees of Institute who had been appointed prior to 01.01.2004 will be governed by Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 and Central Provident Fund (Central Services), Rules 1960 and employees appointed on or after 01.01.2004 will be governed by New Pension Scheme of Central Government - No rules, regulations or orders can prevail over parent statutes - NIT Jamshedpur directed to make arrangements for extending Triple Benefit Scheme to its employees who had retired prior 01.04.1992 also. (Paras 12, 15 and 16)

JUDGMENT :

Heard the parties.

2. Since the identical issues are involved in all these writ petitions, they are being heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

3. Petitioners have approached this Hon’ble Court with a common prayer for issuance of appropriate direction upon the Respondents, especially Respondent No. 2 for grant of pensionary benefits under Rule 29 of the National Institute of Technology Act, 2007.

4. The facts of the case in short is that the present petitioners are either retired employees or legal heirs of the retired employees of NIT, Jamshedpur, who have retired prior to 01.04.1992. It is the case of the petitioners that the Regional Institute of Technology (RIT) was established by the then State Government of Bihar in the year 1960, wherein the expenses of the Institute were equally divided between the State and the Union. Thereafter all Regional Institutes of Technology were converted into National Institute of Technology wherein the complete expenses, fixed as well as recurring were payable by the Union of India. The National Institute of Technology was formed as a result of the ‘First Statute of National Institutes of Technology, 2007’. The said enactment was applicable to all the National Institute of Technology across the country. Rule 29 of the ‘First Statute of National Institutes of Technology, 2007’ reads as under:

    “Rule 29: Provident Funds and Pension Scheme : Employees of the Institute appointed prior to 1.1.2004 will be governed by Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 and Central Provident Fund (Central Services) Rules, 1960 and the employees appointed on or after 1.1.2004 will be governed by New Pension Scheme of Central Government.”

5. It is the further case of the petitioners that even though the act provides that pensionary benefits shall be given to retired employees but the same was denied by the respondent-authorities in a most arbitrary manner and as such, few similarly situated employees approached the respective Hon’ble High Court within the territorial jurisdiction vis-à-vis the NIT was situated. The writ petitions bearing numbered as CWP No. 12522 of 2005, CWP No.3969 of 2005 and 4262 of 2006 were preferred before the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court, by the employees of National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra (Earlier known as Regional Engineering College, Kurukshetra) wherein it was prayed that according to Rule 29 of the National Institute of Technology, 2007 also known as ‘the First statute of National Institutes of technology’ pensionary benefits under the Central Civil Servants (Pension) Scheme, 1972 should be afforded to the employees appointed before 1.1.2004 and the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court was pleased to allow all the writ petitions vide its judgment dated 26.03.2012 and directed the National Institute of Technology (for short NIT), Kurukshetra to publish a circular and give effect to the same. In compliance to the judgment of the Hon’ble Court, NIT Kurukshetra issued a public notice inviting the attention of the employees/ex-employees by giving them an option to avail benefits under the Central Civil Service (Pension Rules), 1972. Subsequently, respondent No. 1 issued a letter dated 21.02.2013, whereby it was decided to implement the scheme for the employees of NIT Kurukshetra and Silchar and requested the concerned authorities to take steps regarding the same. Though the cases of the present petitioners are similar to the employees, who had preferred writ petitions before the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court but the same and similar benefits were denied to the present petitioners, even after repeated requests and representations made by them to that effect. It is the specific case of the petitioners that NIT Kurukshetra took a comprehensive steps and even formed a Pension Cell to co-ordinate and provide pensionary benefits to its employees and ex-employees. The implementation of the same was done by NIT Kurukshetra and

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top