DEEPAK ROSHAN
Rohidas Mahato @ Ruhidas – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant application is directed against the judgment dated 31.07.2014 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Seraikella-Kharsawan in Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2010, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioners have been partly allowed and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.04.2010 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in G.R. Case No. 414 of 2004, whereby the petitioners have been convicted for the offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, has been modified.
2. The learned appellate court in its judgment sustained the conviction of the petitioners so far as the offence under Section 498A IPC is concerned, however, acquitted the petitioners from the charge under Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently argued that they are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no valid marriage between the complainant and the petitioner no. 1, Rohidas Mahato @ Ruhidas. He further submits that the learned trial court has committed a gross error in holdi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.