IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Mr. Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.
Kolhan Samvedak Sangh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand - Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 358 of 2014
Decided On : 17-01-2017
Labour Cess - Building and Other Construction Workers - Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 - Summary: The court dismissed the petition related to the deduction of 1% labour cess under the Building and Other Construction Workers Act, 1996, stating that the ultimate liability to pay cess is upon the contractor, and whether the Labour Cess was included in the estimate earlier or not does not make a difference in the liability of payment upon the contractor. The court referred to the scheme of the BOCW Act and highlighted that the Act aims to ensure the welfare of building and construction workers, directly related to their constitutionally recognized right to live with basic human dignity, enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution. The court emphasized that the burden of cess is passed on from the owner to the contractor.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, a registered union of government contractors and various registered contractors, sought refund of the 1% labour cess deducted from running bills by the respondent-department/employer, contending that the labour cess was not included in the estimate of construction in previous NITs.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the petition, stating that the ultimate liability to pay cess is upon the contractor, and whether the Labour Cess was included in the estimate earlier or not does not make a difference in the liability of payment upon the contractor.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to a refund of the 1% labour cess deducted from the running bills due to the non-inclusion of the labour cess in the estimate of construction in previous NITs.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the ultimate liability to pay cess is upon the contractor, and the inclusion of the Labour Cess in the estimate does not affect the liability of payment upon the contractor.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioners failed to make out a case for interference.
ORDER
Mr. Aparesh Kumar Singh, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioner no. 1 is stated to be a registered union of the Government contractor of district Seraikella Kharsawan. Other petitioners are registered contractor of various work departments of the Government of Jharkhand.
3. The cause raised by way of the instant petition is in relation to deduction of 1% labour cess under the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996.
4. Petitioners contend that the respondent-Department/ Employer have in previous NITs floated by them not chosen to include 1% as labour cess in the estimate of construction though the contractors executing such work have been made to pay 1% labour cess from the running bills. They have, therefore, sought refund of the amount from the respective departments by making representation, which they seek to be decided by the concerned department. They rely upon a communication of the Labour, Employment and Training Department, Government of Jharkhand bearing no. 4013 dated 13.09.2010 which conveyed the respective Work Departments or other instrumentality and agencies engaged in execution of such work to include component of 1% Labour Cess in bill of quantity and estimate for construction. This though was not incorporated in the estimate of NITs issued earlier by the respondent-Rural Works Department but as per the counsel for the petitioners now it is mandatory part of the estimate.
5. Obviously grievance of the petitioners relates to the period where the component of 1% Labour Cess in terms of the Act of 1996 was not part of the estimate. They, therefore, have sought direction upon the respondent to consider their representation and make refund of Labour Cess deducted from the running bills.
6. The Scheme of the BOCW Act came up for consideration before the Hon''ble Supreme Court in the case of National Campaign Commtt., C. L. Labour v. Union of India and Ors. in Writ Petition (C) No. 318 of 2006 and in the case of Dewan Chand Builders and Contractors v. Union of India and Ors. reported in (2012) 1 SCC 101. The Hon''ble Supreme Court upon consideration of the scheme of the Act recognised the noble purpose behind the said Act to ensure welfare of the building and construction workers in order to provide basic human dignity enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution. In the recent judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case of Lanco Anpara Power Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. reported in (2016) 10 SCC 329 , once again the applicability of the Act of 1996 to the construction workers of civil works/factory buildings/buildings intended to set up as factories were called for scrutiny on the plea of the appellant that in case of such construction activity for setting up a factory, the benefit of BOCW Act 1996 and BOCW Welfare Cess Act, 1996 was not available to the workers. The Hon''ble Supreme Court while dealing with the plea of the appellant in the light of the provisions of two Acts of 1996 had occasioned to rely upon the opinion rendered in the case of Dewan Chand Builders and Contractors (Supra) quoted as well at para 29 of report as under:-
"29. The Scheme of the BOCW Act came up for consideration by this Court in Dewan Chand Builders and Contractors v. Union of India. Recognising that the noble purpose behind the said Act is to ensure welfare of the building and construction workers in order to provide basic human dignity enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution, the Court observed as under.
"10. It is thus clear from the scheme of the BOCW Act that its sole aim is the welfare of building and construction workers, directly relatable to their constitutionally recognised right to live with basic human dignity, enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It envisages a network of authorities at the Central and State levels to ensure that the benefit of the legislation is made available to ev
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.