SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Jhk) 1941

RAJESH SHANKAR
Gurucharan Soy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Ashish Kumar Thakur, J.C to S.C (L&C), for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Rajesh Shankar, J. – Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ for quashing the order dated 24.09.2007 contained in Memo No. 4016 passed by the respondent No.5 (Annexure-10 to the writ petition) by reasons of which the petitioner has been dismissed from service and also for quashing the order dated 04.04.2008 contained in Memo No. 573 (Ka) [Annexure-11 to the writ petition] passed by the respondent No.4 in terms of which the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed. The petitioner has further prayed for a direction upon the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service along with all consequential benefits.

3. The factual matrix of the case is that on 28.11.2003 the petitioner joined service as a constable. On 31.03.2004 i.e. within a period of four months from joining of his service, Barajamda Police Outpost, Chaibasa (District-West Singhbum) was attacked by extremists at about 2 P.M and in the said incidence, the extremists looted rifles and cartridges from the said outpost. On 01.04.2004, an FIR was registered in relation to the said incidence being Barajamda P.S. C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top