JUDGMENT

Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J. – I.A. No. 3620 of 2017

Heard Mr. Jyoti Prasad Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arpit Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

2. This Interlocutory Application has been preferred by the petitioner for condoning the delay of 565 days in filing the revision application.

3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 565 days in filing the revision application is, hereby, condoned.

I.A.(Cr.) No. 3621 of 2017

4. This Interlocutory Application has been preferred by the petitioner for exempting the petitioner to surrender in terms of Rule 159 of the High Court of Jharkhand Rules, 2001.

5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has been compromised between the parties and a joint compromise petition by way of I.A. (Cr.) No. 4033 of 2017 has also been filed from which it appears that entire dishonored cheque amount has already been returned back to the opposite party no. 2.

6. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has accepted the factum of compromise and stated that he does not have any grievance if the present a