RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
Syed Khurshid Akhtar @ Khurshid Akhtar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J. – I.A. No. 828 of 2017
Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashish Jha, learned A.P.P. for the State as well as Mr. Sidhant, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2.
2. This Interlocutory Application has been preferred by the petitioner for condonation of delay of 97 days in filing the revision application.
3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 97 days of filing the revision application is hereby condoned.
4. I.A. No. 828 of 2017 stands disposed of.
I.A. No. 829 of 2017
5. This Interlocutory Application has been preferred by the petitioner for seeking exemption to surrender in terms of Rule 159 of the High Court of Jharkhand Rules, 2001.
6. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after dismissal of the appeal the matter has been compromised and an amount of 55,000/- has already been paid by the petitioner to the opposite party no. 2 which could be evident from the Memorandum of Settlement dated 08.12.2016.
7. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 has accepted the factum of compromis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.