SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Jhk) 2183

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Nandlal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Jiblal Yadav – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Raj Kumar Prasad, Advocate, for the Petitioners

JUDGMENT

Shree Chandrashekhar, J. - Inspite of service of notice upon the respondents, they have not chosen to appear in the present proceeding.

2. Aggrieved of order dated 03.03.2009 passed in Title Suit No. 46 of 1999 by which further proceeding in the said suit has been stayed till disposal of Partition Suit No. 28 of 1999, the petitioners have approached this Court.

3. Briefly stated, Title Suit No. 46 of 1999 and Partition Suit No. 28 of 1999, both were instituted on the same day, that is, on 25.11.1999. Title Suit No. 46 of 1999 was instituted by Smt. Tejni Devi for a decree of declaration of her title and possession over schedule ''B'' properties. In the said suit, initially there were 9 defendants, one of the defendants was Jiblal Yadav. Partition Suit No. 28 of 1999 was instituted by Basudeo Yadav and Gokhul Yadav. In the partition suit, there were as many as 29 defendants, one of them was Jiblal Yadav. Cause of action for instituting Title Suit No. 46 of 1999 has been disclosed by the plaintiff in paragraph No. 13 and 14 of the plaint, where-under she has averred that the defendants have threatened her to dispossess her from the suit land and harvest the crops grown over t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top