SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Jhk) 2203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Shree Chandrashekhar, J.
Anand Kumar Sahu - Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand & Ors. - Respondent
Bail Application No. 5405 of 2017
Decided On : 11-05-2018

Advocates Appeared:
D.K. Prasad, Adv., Azeemuddin, Adv., Vishal Kumar Tiwary, Adv.

The court has the discretion to grant provisional bail in criminal cases based on the nature of the alleged offences, the stage of trial, and the evidence presented.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Offences - Provisional bail granted to petitioner in connection with offences under sections 408/420/34 IPC and sections 65/66/66(B) of Information Technology Act, 2000

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought bail in a case involving offences under sections 408/420/34 IPC and sections 65/66/66(B) of Information Technology Act, 2000. The petitioner claimed lack of legal evidence implicating him, while the prosecution contended that sufficient materials had been collected to establish his complicity.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the release of the petitioner on provisional bail, subject to specific conditions, considering the nature of the alleged offences and the commencement of the trial. The court also ordered the petitioner to report his attendance to the police and imposed restrictions on his place of residence and engagement in criminal activities.

Issues: Bail application in a case involving criminal offences under IPC and Information Technology Act, 2000

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature of the alleged offences, the stage of trial, and the absence of legal evidence implicating the petitioner in granting provisional bail with specific conditions.

Final Decision: The petitioner, Anand Kumar Sahu, was directed to be released on provisional bail, subject to specific conditions, and the matter was scheduled for further review.

JUDGMENT

Shree Chandrashekhar, J. – The petitioner is seeking bail in Ranchi (Sadar) P.S.Case No.178 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. No.1865 of 2017, which was registered for offences under sections 408/420/34 IPC and for offences under sections 65/66/66(B) of Information Technology Act, 2000.

2. Heard Mr. D.K. Prasad, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Azeemuddin, the leaned APP and Mr. Vishal Kumar Tiwary, the learned counsel for the informant.

3. Contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is that there is no legal evidence collected during the course of investigation which would prima-facie disclose his involvement in the case.

4. The learned APP and the learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for grant of bail contending that sufficient materials have been collected during the course of investigation which would disclose complicity of the petitioner in the crime.

5. It appears that the petitioner was sent to judicial custody on 28.04.2017 and the trial has already commenced. The offences alleged against the petitioner are all triable by the Magistrate, 1st Class and, infact, the alleged offences committed by the petitioner under Information Technology Act, 2000 are all bailable.

6. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Anand Kumar Sahu is directed to be released on Provisional bail, if not wanted in connection to any other criminal case, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Ranchi (Sadar) P.S.Case No.178 of 2017, corresponding to G.R. No.1865 of 2017, on the following conditions:

    (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close family member of the petitioner;

      (ii) that the petitioner shall not change his place of residence without prior permission of the Court;

        (iii) that the petitioner shall record his attendance in the office of the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi on every Monday; and

          (iv) that he shall not indulge himself in any crime and if a case is reported against him, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of provisional bail granted to him.

          7. A report on subsequent conduct of the petitioner shall be filed by the Investigating Officer in the trial court, a copy of which shall be produced before this Court before the next date of hearing.

          8. Post the matter on 14.08.2018.

          9. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the learned trial court and the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi through FAX.

          10. Let a copy of this order be given to the learned A.P.P.

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top