Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Pramath Patnaik, J.
Ayodhaya Pandey - Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand & Ors. - Respondent
W.P. (S) No. 6015 of 2009
Decided On : 13-06-2018
Dismissal - Writ Petition - Non-prosecution - The court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution, as the petitioner's counsel did not appear despite repeated calls.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's counsel did not appear on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
Issues: Non-appearance of petitioner's counsel
Ratio Decidendi: Dismissal for non-prosecution
Final Decision: The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGMENT
Pramath Patnaik, J. – None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. On 26.02.2018 none appeared on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated call.
3. It appears that learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ application.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
