PRAMATH PATNAIK
Anil Tanti – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pramath Patnaik, J. – In the captioned writ application, the petitioner has interalia sought for direction upon the respondents for appointment on the post of Constable in pursuance to Advertisement No.1/2010 for District Force as well as Industries Security Force. The petitioner has further prayed for direction upon respondent for production of the original master chart regarding selection conducted by the Selection Board and entire selection list in OBC I category.
2. In pursuance to Advertisement No.1/2010 for District force as well as Industries Security Force, the petitioner submitted the application for Deoghar District in District Force and after completion of the selection procedure, final result was published in the month of March, 2013 and the name of the petitioner did not find place in the select list. Thereafter, the petitioner approached the competent authority under right to Information Act for providing his marks viz-a-viz last selected candidates in his category. As per the information supplied the mark secured was 32 marks and his height was 159.3 CM. It has been averred in the writ application that though the height of the petitioner was more than 160 CM
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.