SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Jhk) 2018

S.N.PATHAK
Md Tausif Jamal Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amritansh Vats, Adv., Sameer Sahai, Adv.

JUDGMENT

S.N. Pathak, J. – The petitioner has approached this Court with a direction upon the respondents for appointment to the post of Police Constable in Indian Reserve Battalion in pursuance to Advertisement No. 01/2011 dated 15.09.2011.

2. The factual exposition as has been delineated in the writ petition is that an advertisement was floated by the respondents for appointment to the post of police constables in Indian Reserve Battalion as Advertisement No. 01/11, which was published in the Hindi Newspaper Dainik Jagran dated 15.09.2011. The petitioner having requisite qualification for appointment to the said post, applied for same. Thereafter, upon verification of the same, an admit card was issued for appearing in the examination and roll number was allotted to the petitioner. In view of the said admit card, the petitioner appeared in the physical test as well as written test, in which the petitioner was selected. Thereafter, the results were published in the year, 2013 wherein, the name of the petitioner was appearing in the merit list. When the name of the petitioner appeared in the merit list, the petitioner approached the respondents-authorities wherein, the petitioner wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top