JUDGMENT

Aparesh Kumar Singh, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner a Constable under probation under the Respondent Central Reserve Police Force was undergoing training at Gurgaon Group Centre when he was terminated from service under Rule 5 Sub Rule (1) of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Services) Rules, 1965 read with Rule 16(a) of the CRPF Rule 1955.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the Respondents have argued on merits of the impugned decision. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the foundation for passing the order of termination is based on stigmatic grounds.

4. Learned counsel for the Respondents has placed the contents of the counter affidavit and supplementary counter affidavit. She submits that petitioner himself made admission in his application dated 14.05.2008 that he had availed 20 days leave on the ground of death of his mother, though after rejoining he informed that his mother was alive and that he had incurred marriage during that period (Annexure-IV to the supplementary counter affidavit). Respondents did not consider such conduct of the petitioner as in good order and as per discipline of the force. Retention of suc