SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Jhk) 2682

ANANT BIJAY SINGH, KAILASH PRASAD DEO
Shyam Sunder Sardar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anand Kumar Pandey, Adv.

JUDGMENT

1. The sole appellant, Shyam Sunder Sardar faced trial in S.T. Case No.249 of 1999 [arising out of Chandil P.S. Case No.11 of 1999 corresponding to G.R. No.49 of 1999 passed by Sri B. K. Goswami, learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Seraikella, whereby, learned Judge vide judgment dated 20.08.2004 held the appellant guilty under Section 302 I.P.C. and awarded life imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of fine, further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.

2. The instant Criminal Appeal was admitted for hearing on 17.05.2005 and L.C.R. was called for and the appellant was admitted on bail. Vide order dated 20.04.2005, Ms. Nirupma, Advocate was appointed as Amicus Curiae, but she was not present in the Court today. Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate (whose Mobile Number being 94311-67600) was appointed as amicus curiae in this case to assist the Court. The Member Secretary, Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority is directed to issue nomination letter to amicus curiae, Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate and also quantify his fee for appearing in this case.

3. Call for a report regarding status of the appellant from the concerned trial Court as to whether

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top