JUDGMENT

S.N.Pathak, J. - Heard the parties.

2. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has approached this Court for a direction upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization as she has completed more than 10 years of service.

3. The factual exposition as has been delineated in the writ petition is that petitioner is working as a Computer Operator as daily wager since 31.03.2004 in the office of respondents and discharging her duties sincerely and to the satisfaction of the respondent-authorities. It is the specific case of the petitioner that she had also been sent for training as required for the post and she is being paid salary from the concerned department. Thereafter, through several letters, the District Transport Officers has also requested/ recommended the name of the petitioner for her regularization before the higher authorities but till date no decision has been taken by the respondents for her regularization/ absorption inspite of the fact that she has been discharging his duties since 2004 i.e. for more than 10 years without any complain from any corner. Hence, the petitioner has been constrained to knock the door of this Hon''ble