SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Jhk) 1322

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Rajiv Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.S. Choudhary, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Shree Chandrashekhar, J. - The petitioner, who is one of the accused in Sahibganj (Town) P.S. Case No. 91 of 2013 which has been registered for the offence under Section 420 read with Section 120B IPC and Section 3, 4, 5, 6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, is aggrieved of the order dated 14.09.2015 passed in Sahibganj (Town) P.S. Case No. 91 of 2013 by which his application for discharge has been declined.

2. Contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is that without recording a finding that ingredients of the offence as defined under Section 415 IPC, that is, cheating, the petitioner''s petition for discharge cannot be dismissed.

3. At the outset, it needs to be recorded that it is not the language of an order which matters most, content and essence of the order have also to be seen. The learned trial court in its order dated 14.09.2015 has recorded that the petitioner is the main collection agent of the company and there is sufficient material available on record against the petitioner to frame charge under Section 420/120B IPC. Not only that, there is a reference of paragraph nos. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of the case diary on the basis of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top