SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Jhk) 1478

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Sudip Kumar Mukhopadhyay @ S K Mukhopadhyay – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Das, Adv., Pooja Kumari, Adv., Mukesh Kumar, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Shree Chandrashekhar, J. - The petitioners are aggrieved of the order dated 12.12.2007 by which cognizance of the offence under section 285, 304-A read with section 34 IPC and under section 72 of the Mines Act, 1952 has been taken.

2. Various grounds including the one founded on the decision in the State (NCT of Delhi) Vs. Sanjay" reported in , (2014) 9 SCC 772 have been raised by the petitioners to challenge the legality of the order taking cognizance, however, after arguing for some time seeking liberty for the petitioners to raise all such plea which are available to them in law, Mr. A. K. Das, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this quash-petition.

3. This prayer is not opposed by Mr. Mukesh Kumar, the learned A.P.P.

4. In view of the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioners, without commenting upon merits of the plea raised on behalf of the petitioners, Cr.M.P No. 1229 of 2017 stands withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners, as prayed for.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top